Should immigrants in the United States illegally who are convicted of a crime be transferred or deported from the US?
General Reference (not clearly pro or con)
James Sterngold, Staff Writer at the San Francisco Chronicle, in a May 4, 2006 San Francisco Chronicle article entitled "Bid Fails to Deport Immigrant Prisoners - Bill to Ease Crowding Seen as a Victim of Demonstrations," wrote:
"The
state has struggled for years to reduce the soaring population in its
overburdened prisons, but a proposal that could have forced as many as
20,000 inmates who are illegal immigrants to serve their sentences in
their home countries has faltered over concerns it would be viewed as
anti-immigrant. The idea of having undocumented immigrants convicted of
felonies in California serve their sentences in their home countries
has been debated over the years, but it generally stalled based on two
objections: concern that the prisoners would be treated differently at
home, because they would probably serve shorter sentences; and concern
that the inmates might be denied due process in being transferred."
Should immigrants in the United States illegally who are convicted of a crime be transferred or deported from the US?
PRO (yes)
CON (no)
Richard Jones, MS, Sheriff of Butler County in Ohio, in a Jan. 31, 2006 Washington Times article titled "Ohio Sheriff Bills U.S. Government for Jailed Illegals," stated:
"Why should Butler County
taxpayers have to pay for jail costs associated with people we
don't believe should ever have been in this country, let alone
this state or county, to begin with?.. It's time the federal
government should at least pay for the criminals they let stay
here... If they don't want to pay for them, then they can deport
them..."
The Los Angeles Times, in a Feb. 6, 2007 editorial entitled "Send Convicted Illegal Immigrants Home," offered the following:
"The [Los Angeles] county is
right to send the illegal immigrants in its jails to deportation
hearings after their sentences... Deporting them won't solve
overcrowding in the short term because they have to serve their
sentences before being turned over to the feds, but it will
probably reduce crime and the jail population over the long
term... There should be a path to citizenship for illegal
immigrants, but convicts have forfeited the right to be on it.
Send them home."
Lamar Smith, U.S. Representative (R-TX), in a July 27, 1998 hearing before the House of Representatives' Subcommittee of Immigrations and Claims entitled "Problems Related to Criminal Aliens in Utah," stated:
"Some
of these illegal aliens are also habitual criminals... they impose a
harsh fiscal cost on local taxpayers who must foot the bill for new
jails and increased law enforcement. Local government law enforcement
officials... are faced with a massive and continual onslaught of
criminal illegal aliens, they can easily become overwhelmed... You have
a right to expect that when a criminal is arrested, the INS
[Immigration and Naturalization Service] will help determine quickly if
he or she is an illegal alien. If a criminal is an illegal alien, the
INS should detain and deport that person immediately."
Human Rights Watch, in a July 18, 2007 report titled "Forced Apart - Families Separated and Immigrants Harmed by United States Deportation Policy," offered the following:
"Immigrants also have
been deported for relatively minor and non-violent crimes, raising
the question of whether deportation is a proportionate penalty to
impose on top of the criminal sentences they have already served.
When
Congress set out to change immigration laws in 1996, it wanted to
ensure that the worst non-citizen offenders were deported from the
United States... But the changes were so overbroad as to impose
permanent exile from the United States for non-violent, misdemeanor
crimes—even in cases where the court determined that the crime was so
minor that it did not warrant a prison sentence...
...it is
time for Congress to amend these laws, restore proportionality to the
law, and eliminate their unintended consequences... to ensure that
immigrants are not deported for minor (especially non-violent) offenses
or for offenses that were not grounds for deportation at the time they
were committed."
Alison Parker, JD, Attorney and Senior Researcher at Human Rights Watch, in a July 18, 2007 Yahoo News! article titled "Rights Group Labels US Deportation of Criminal Immigrants 'Cruel,'" stated:
"The
laws [deporting criminal immigrants] are not only cruel in their
rigidity, they are senseless... Most members of the European Union and
other major democracies take family relationships and other links to
the country of immigration into account before a final deportation
decision is made... But immigration judges' hands are tied in the US;
there is nothing they can do to protect families..."